patching...
Breaking: Minutes From Seaside Heights, Sandy's Destruction Still Apparent »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Christie: Strong Dunes Save Lives, Rebuilding Them Will Employ New Jerseyans

Christie Visit to Bradley Beach focuses on importance of dunes, employment grants

 

With the whir of front loaders and bulldozers pushing sand on the beachfront behind him, Gov. Chris Christie today pointed to rebuilding an aggressive dune system as perhaps the most important step in restoring and safeguarding tourism, property and residents' lives along the Jersey Shore.

After surveying the rebuilding of dunes flattened by Hurricane Sandy, Christie outlined how state grants for post-disaster employment needs were directly rebuilding the beachfront of Bradley Beach. Here, 12 workers were the beneficiaries of the National Emergency Grant, secured in the days following Hurricane Sandy.

Christie said the grants had put 428 to work in 11 hurricane-ravaged towns statewide, with 658 more to be employed through state Department of Labor programs.

The governor's visit to Bradley Beach, a town Christie said was saved from widespread Sandy damage thanks to its dune system, was on Monday morning for the twin purpose of discussing the importance of rebuilding dunes and also to announce continued employment and training grants which could aid the Jersey Shore's rebuilding.

'We need to rebuild an aggressive dune system'

Christie said the stories of oceanfront devastation vary widely throughout the Jersey Shore, but that dune-protected areas fared better.

Nearly every shorefront community should be planning an "aggressive dune system," Christie told a crowd of about 100 local officials, residents and media on Ocean Avenue Monday.

"The work being done, from sand sifting to sand moving to dune building to bulkhead building is essential," said the governor.

The Army Corps of Engineers would have a large part in the dune restoration process, especially if a federal bill for Sandy aid passed tomorrow. Plans for dune work were already approved for Sandy Hook to Harvey Cedars, Christie said.

"The Army Corps of Engineers have already authorized it; they just need the funding to be approved for it," Christie said.

Christie had strong words for private beachfront associations and landowners hesitant to grant easements or who are otherwise continuing to investigate dune building on their property.

"There should be no debate," said the governor. "They are being extremely selfish and shortsighted."

The dunes should be protecting the shore, and that is more important than an individual's concern, he said, and the state would look into how to ensure the battle over dunes is won.

"They're putting people's lives and property at risk because they want to have a better view," he said.

Christie: Dept. of Labor programs will spur employment

The day after Sandy hit, state Labor Commissioner Harold J. Wirths worked to secure $15.6 million in National Employment Grant funds to work on the cleanup and rebuilding jobs initiative.

Today's press conference outlined how three state labor programs — Recovery4Jersey, Skills4Jersey and Opportunity4Jersey — will create jobs, train and update skills, and seek out employers looking for skilled workers, all specifically to aid employment sectors impacted and in demand after Hurricane Sandy.

Whether it is a national utility company or a mom-and-pop restaurant, these programs are available for employers undertaking the rebuilding and restoration work, Christie said.

Two hundred employers have applied for the grants so far in the first round of funding. Another deadline for employers is January 18.

"This is really good news about their willingness to invest in the state," Christie said of the companies awarded approximately $26 million in grants.

Four months until Memorial Day

Bradley Beach Mayor Gary Engelstad invited Christie to Memorial Day along the beachfront, to see how far they've come.

"There are four months until Memorial Day," said the mayor. "We've got a great story to tell."

The story must be told, Christie said, to spur tourism to areas that are "Open for Business."

"If they know the beaches are ready, they will come," the governor said of tourists.

About this column: News and essential information about Hurricane Sandy in New Jersey. Related Topics: Bradley Beach, Chris Christie, Hurricane Sandy, Hurricane Sandy rebuilding, dune restoration, and hurricane sandy employment

Da Poppa

1:41 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

Go ahead, rebuild the dunes, but I want unfettered access to those beaches. Rebuild the dunes and replenish the beaches with taxpayer money? Then the state should take possession of any property under eminent domain, properly reimburse the property owners at fair market value and open up those beaches to the taxpayers.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Donna Griffin

5:42 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

DaPoppa - No more taxpayer dollars to build dams in north Jersey? No more tax payer dollars to aid flooded properties along the Delaware, Passaic or Raritan Rivers? No more taxpayer dollars to aid in wild fires? I don't recall a cry for eminent domain on those counts. We live in a coastal state. The operative word in that statement is "WE." Private beach owners have an obligation to rebuild the dunes. If they do not in fairly short order, the town should do so and send the bill to the property owner. If they do not pay the bill, then open up the land to public access. I don't like the end game in the perpetual easement argument. It makes it way too easy for a town to knock on anybody's door and take away their home. It's kind of like changing the rules in the middle of the game for a property owner. Public access is not an issue of public safety. The dunes, however, are.

Comment_arrow

Da Poppa

9:10 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

Donna, where exactly did I say no more tax dollars to do the rebuilding necessary to repair any of those items? No where. What I did say is I am tired of paying tax dollars to do this rebuilding on private land, then being denied free and unfettered access, as the owners, businesses, towns block access. And if you didn't hear cries of eminent domain in those other instances, you weren't listening. Why continue to pay to rebuild in areas that should not be built on with taxpayer dollars? So the private owners build again in flood prone areas? So we can bail them out? So they can block access to land we help rebuild? I don't think so. Pay them fair market value for the land, and clear out flood prone areas. The cost is not just the rebuild, think of the costs of evacuation and rescue. It's staggering, and the taxpayers bear the brunt.

Comment_arrow

rureallysurprise

10:31 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

I think there is a lot of people who feel the same way as you do!

Comment_arrow

Donna Griffin

7:15 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

DP - I inferred it when you said "...replenish the beaches with taxpayer money?" I'm not so sure that we are not on the same page, however. I'm simply saying that towns over many decades have allowed and legislated for "private" oceanfront property ownership. I say yet again, the dunes are a matter of public safety. Rebuild them NOW. To wrap beach access in perpetuity into the matter is an argument better suited for another day. Laws would need to be changed and to have vulnerable towns subjected to the slow-moving local and state legislative processes is ridiculous at this point. If a gas leak were detected on your property, it would be repaired immediately. It isn't a question as to who is going to take care of the bill as the leak presents an imminent threat to property owners. I liken the dune argument to the same principal. For towns, such as Ortley Beach, to want to attempt to kill two birds with one stone by muddying the process with beach access issues is endangering the citizens on the barrier island (and on the mainland). PUT THE DUNES UP EVERYWHERE. Argue the other issues later.

I have spoken

1:49 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

NO DUNES WITHOUT EASEMENTS!!!!

It sickens me that my tax dollars may go to build dunes on private property. Obviously of all the homeowner associations on Ortley one had the smarts to sign the easement.

And the holdouts hired Robert Guttman....LOL

Reply
Comment_arrow

edward simmons

3:00 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

AS a nj lbi resident ...we pay to go on the beaches ,even owning on the island ...$35. a season ..it is not free

Comment_arrow

John Q

4:55 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Does anybody know what Brick fees are compared to private property owners who pay for their own lifeguards? Maybe a little more then $35 per year.

J

3:02 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

Suppose one were to build dunes in Belmar, where the beach is essentially a flat stretch from boardwalk to ocean: how high would they have to be to be effective, and would people strolling the boardwalk still be able to see the ocean?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Donna Griffin

5:43 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

J - To be effective, you would lose the ocean view. That is what the homeowners of Midway Beach sacrificed and they faired very well during Sandy. The dunes would need to be at least 20 ft. high by about 40+ feet wide.

Comment_arrow

rureallysurprise

10:33 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

Didn't a couple from LBI sue the town for this. Ocean view blocked by DUNES!

Comment_arrow

Donna Griffin

6:20 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

rureally - Thank the judge on that one. The same happened to an oceanfront owner in Deal and she lost her home, but said it was worth it to live with her precious oceanview for even one day. I have a feeling her flooded neighbors might think differently. Again, the dunes are a matter of public safety that impacts EVERY property owner nearby. The rebuild of those dunes ought to be non-negotiable. Either change the laws henceforth and do not allow for private beach ownership or change the building codes today to not allow for the rebuild of those properties without the aggressive dune system necessary to protect the public.

Comment_arrow

ray westley

11:24 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

I wonder the same thing. One of the reason's I frequent the shore so much is the scenery. If I am looking at huge mounds of sand I will go elsewhere.

Comment_arrow

VoiceofReason

12:23 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Bye Bye ray - please go elsewhere. Let us protect our towns.

Sal

3:07 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

Dunes alone are a total waste of money and only a temporary fix until the next major storm hits and they get washed away again. Island Beach State Park has the best widest and tallest sand dunes in the entire state and the roadway is far from the beach___yet Hurricane Sandy none-the-less made it way through the huge dunes at Island Beach Park and covered the roadway in sand. Stone and concrete walls like the one in Seabright, NJ provide the best level of protection and they are permanent___so we do not have to keep paying like with sand dunes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

proud

10:46 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

How about the people that won 340k in a tax appeal litigation because their view was obstructed. They lost the view, but their house survived the storm. What would their ocean view look like if they were floating across Burlington County? All on the taxpayer dime. How darr the public access the water or the dunes they paid for. Damn.

Comment_arrow

Mark Calendar

10:28 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Seabright did great in the storm with those walls JA.

Comment_arrow

foggyworld

3:39 pm on Monday, April 29, 2013

The dunes at Island Beach State Park were not 25' high nor were they maintained. But while the Governor supports putting up those needed dunes, for some reason - like maybe his summer mansion view would be blocked - he has excluded that six miles from the program. It is bound to have a negative effect on the Back Bay areas as the lack of dunes did throughout Sandy.

Michael Capo

3:14 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

Will Seaside Heights build dunes that will block the view of the ocean from the boardwalk........remains to be seen. They didnt have any dunes at all before Sandy for that very reason.

Reply

George

7:12 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

One town is putting a steel wall in, then covering it with dunes. Otherwise, how about clear plexiglass walls strong enough to withstand an ocean storm surge? They would leave a view.

Reply

mjmjr

7:35 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

THEY SHOULD NOT REBUILD 200 FEET FROM THE EXISTING OCEAN AVE.THIS WILL HAPPEN AGAIN,BUILD HIGHER DUNES AND REMOVE ALL HOUSES 200FT FROM EXISTING BOARDWALK AREA.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dame Bridgid

12:50 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

Please, stop shouting at us. It is extremely rude!
You want to trash the entire beach economy by removing everything between Ocean Ave & A Street? What about the businesses? Plus, just where are all those people you intend to displace from their homes to go? Public housing?
The houses that are wrecked were mainly a less sturdy type of construction. The waters were able to move them because they had no real anchorage. The solid structures with better foundations that usually included basements are still there, & can be made habitable again. Replacement with better built houses will prevent most future losses by upgrading to storm hardened structures.
When the boardwalk is rebuilt to reflect current storm codes, it's pillions will be sunk 25 feet deep, rather than the 5 feet that gave way under Sandy. With properly reinforced storm strapping that the old structure lacked, the boardwalk will serve as a better buffer teamed up with the dunes that were already created for that area.
Small mainland shore towns cannot simply abandon the shoreline because that zone provides most of the revenue for locals. It also funnels a substantial portion of that money into the rest of New Jersey. The income derived directly from the shore provides services for towns & cities far inland after it goes into state coffers to be redistributed.
You suggestion urges us to slaughter the sea bird that lays the golden eggs. Please rethink this.

Laci

8:06 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

Require a dune for a Certificate of Occupancy, just like you need operating smoke alarm.

Reply
Comment_arrow

J

10:46 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013

Even if feasible, that would only apply to towns with houses located on the beach, and is irrelevant to towns like Belmar, Spring Lake, etc., where the closest houses are separated from the beach by road and boardwalk.

PPNB

7:13 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Where did all that dune sand end up? Have you any idea how much it would cost to buy all that sand privately owned? Unfettered access with no maintenance or guards. Good Luck.

Reply

suz

7:58 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Heard yesterday that some towns are fighting the rebuilding of dunes. Yes, even after their homes were damaged, they still want their precious view. Thats just wrong.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark Calendar

10:29 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

The government needs to stop wasting taxpayer money on rebuilding. If you choose to live there face the risks.

visionary

9:10 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Just forget the Dunes......How about the weeks before a major storm we siphon water from the ocean, say 3-5 ft and send it into space. Or maybe dig a huge gulley or vertical tunnel in the middle of the ocean which would alleviate some of the water near our shores. The world would be thankful for this...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark Calendar

10:30 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Maybe algore and obama can just drink it all or send it to kenya I think there is a drought there.

VoiceofReason

12:20 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Ok, so you don't live ON the beach in a home with oceanfront property on a private beach BUT - you live a few blocks in, where if the dune were NOT there since you don't want your tax dollars paying for it, then the guy with the ocean front house completely loses his home and yours gets not only ruined by water but slammed by the rubbel of this home as well as it washes through town since there were no dune.

You people have some nerve. Our entire state was ruined by this storm. If you can't handle the necessary things that are going to happen to TRY to fix the mass amounts of devastation, do yourself a favor, MOVE to a state where you can live like a hermit and not be bothered by anyone else.

Reply

Penn Cross

4:42 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

This article makes me wonder if the Manasquan Beach improvement association still wants the mayor and council to look into lowering the height of the dunes so to improve members view of the ocean.

Reply

Mike

2:11 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Tax payer money, to enhance private property. Does not sound right. If you live on, or near the ocean, you should be able to afford the upkeep. If you can't afford it, don't live there...and don't ask me to help you afford it.

Reply

anthony esposito

8:13 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013

Tell Christie to reopen route 35 n in Mantoloking, that would be a great start to getting back to normal. Leave the Dunes a d Barrier Island to. Nature. I'm saying this and I live on the barrier islands

This ins more campaign rhetoric

Reply

hard working sucker

6:38 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

i don't understand. fema is telling us we have to get flood insurance at our expense. no debating the issue, just do it. why doesn't fema just tell the people in mantaloking etc that they must put their own dunes up at their own expense, and just do it! why aren't they being bullied by fema like us?

Reply
Comment_arrow

wookfish

7:04 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

that's what happens when you let big government run every facet of your life....bohica

hard working sucker

7:23 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

let's make big government listen to us instead of the 20% wealthy. got any ideas?. how about one of us lowly working class running for big gov't. how many people in big gov't are not wealthy..probably no one. do they understand how to live on what they go out and earn? do they have to balance a checkbook and not eat a meal because they can't afford it? do they understand worry? i think not. i don't begrudge anyone who has money, but they should understand that not everyone is as fortunate as them. we have a fight everyday to keep our roofs over our heads and to pay our bills that are not bills of luxury. when was the last time the middleclass bought anything because it would be fun to own? probably not in quite a few years. by the way, i'm just a plain ordinary person..what does bohica mean?

Reply

Claire

7:31 am on Monday, January 21, 2013

You are making a logical point. People have to listen to reason. Even Trump is. He has been on the news. This is our country we are fighting for.

Reply

Nautigal

9:38 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

It doesn't sound like a lot of you know the science behind the dunes working. They aren't the only solution and they cause their own problems. Where do you think all the sand that's now in the bay came from? Lots of other places have these problems and do way more sophisticated mitigation (Holland, Japan, Louisiana to name a few). ray w. isn't the only one who won't come to the shore to spend money to look at a huge pile of sand - there're plenty of other places to go. I find it really unfortunate that so many people on the Patch feel like they have to throw their barrier island neighbors under the bus. We're in this together. By the way, there are PLENTY of places your tax money funds that you don't have "free and unfettered access" to - F-cove comes to mind, among others. Also, if any of you would bother to read the Biggert Waters Act, which is going to wipe out the middle class in NJ, destroy the Jersey Shore as we know it, and essentially create the greatest tax increase in history, you would know that "beach nourishment" is not approved for hazard mitigation. Get your shit together, Jersey. Or the party is over. And no - I don't live on the island. I have 1000 sq. ft bungalow in Brick and I am hosed.

Reply

Marc

9:44 pm on Tuesday, April 2, 2013

As a 6th grade student at East Dover Elementary School inI 1982 we took a class trip to IBSP and planted Dune Grass with a man named Mr Dougherty , that was a man with a vision

Reply

educatedsmallbizowner

1:49 pm on Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Great Christie, So now you can have more illegals taking the blue collar jobs away.. Unions will never forget you having the DCA (Department of corrupt consumer affairs) not fine any (even though they recieved summonses) of those non union construction companies that hired illegal aliens that did not pay payroll tax (to include health care tax) that were used to mop out the Fat Rich Boys cronies homes along the shore. Thios epoor illegals were not given proper protective devices or breathing aparatus... , The owners of these companies did not have to have proper registrations and insurance either!. Christie is the epicenter of Fraud and Only for the rich in NJ... Oh yeah and he loves to suppress the poor it is quite obvious by his actions while in "POWER" ... But not for long.... I am not pro Dem or Rep. Just looking to squeeze out the corrupt wealthy off my sweat to create an equal playing for all.... OK sorry I believe this is still America and I am not going to let the politicians give it away to INDIA ansd CHINA for there own agenda.. Oh do you not feel good over 1400 people (many children) in India died in an faulty factoryu for making clothes to be sold in AMERICA... We cry about the 50+ killed by a tornado? Polliticans are killing way more because of there greed!!

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Manasquan-Belmar Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks